.
Feedback

Body Scanning for Shopping — Will You Do It?

With all the information being collected about us everywhere we go, will you add your full body scan to the list, for consumer purposes?

Sometime this year, you might walk into a mall and be offered a complete body scan — with your clothes on — not for medical reasons, such as bone density, but in order to find the best-fitting pair of jeans.

The scenario might go something like this. You walk into yet another store with your blood sugar draining and feeling more depressed about not finding what you want, wishing you hadn’t consumed half that pie left over in the fridge on Wednesday night and all those margaritas on Saturday. The bulge around the middle won’t budge no matter how much you fantasize about exercising more and eating less.

No problem! The cheerful clerk, working on commission, has everything you need. Just follow her to meet the new “Woman’s Best Friend."

A company called MyBestFit now offers a cylindrical space that a buyer steps into for a 10-second scan, and, hey presto, all your measurements — I mean the real ones, not the ones you tell your girlfriends or latest guy — are now “in the system.” You even get a bar code that describes just you.

Now, armed with information that fits just you, you can go to participating stores in the mall and find exactly the jeans that accommodate that bulge or maybe an extra-long waist, rather large thighs or unfashionably short legs.

Done! You’ve saved so much time, you have half an hour for a milkshake and fries with your friends!

But seriously, does this scanning business bother anyone?

I mean, I’m just curious if there’s any smidgeon of ourselves we can keep, you know, to ourselves?

Some doctor’s offices now ask for patients to scan their driver’s license into “the system” because, I’m told, people are trying to use other people’s insurance. Thumbs or fingers are used by some other health practitioners and gyms to let “the system” know you’ve arrived and the technology for microchipping humans is already available.

This sort of personal information, combined with the GPS in our cell phones and the way we seem to be fascinated with spreading our most intimate personal information and whereabouts all over social networking sites ... well, let’s just say we’re living in a new world baby.

I can remember my mother telling me to close the blinds before I got changed in my room. But, this, well! This is a whole new level of information gathering.

It’s probably not long before everyone will be scanned. Think of the applications for Father’s Day, for example.

“Dad, do you mean you haven’t been scanned yet! OMG, you are so far behind the times, it’s like, humiliating. I just need you to give me your bar code so I can spend 10 minutes finding you something that fits you perfectly — hopefully it’ll tell me the stuff you like too because, well, sorry we haven’t had time to talk lately — and then I can spend the rest of the time at the mall with my friends. Duh!”

The first of the MyBestFit scanners is operating in a mall outside Philadelphia. At least 13 more are planned for stores in California and along the East Coast by the end of the year.

The company states that the scanner, similar to those used at airport checkpoints, uses low-frequency radio waves that aren’t harmful.

"It's the equivalent of 1/1000th of a cell phone call," Elizabeth Thomas, director of marketing, told Ramona Patch by email. "The waves bounce off the skin so no information is collected about internal organs."

She said no one under 13 is being scanned yet because MyBestFit doesn't match those sizes and styles yet.

"Only outside body measurement data is collected," Thomas stated. "No body image is created."

Stores pay a fee to be included in the resulting brands, styles and sizes recommended. Shoppers use their bar code to create a Shopper's Guide. Thomas said the report does not give customers their measurements; they're just told if they are a size 6, 8, 9 or 12 within a particular brand.

Consumers, so far, are praising the accuracy of the results and the ease of getting scanned, according to news reports.

Thomas says no one has access to an individual’s information. The company is pondering privacy issues related to whether to provide family members with the information, for example, but, she says, "Maybe in the future."

"However," she says, "the aggregate data can by compiled and used to determine 'mean' averages of the population. Any company that makes a product that is meant to fit a body can use this aggregate data to help them create better fitting products."

So, moms, I’m interested to know, will you be one of the first to get scanned because of the potential for saving shopping time? Will you be OK with your family members being scanned?

Or are you wondering where all this is leading and what will happen if all the information is eventually put together — if there comes a time when the suggestion “let me look in your eyes” is not a romantic one but a request for the personal information scanned into your irises or something?

What’s that old saying?

Oh, yes.

“Power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts.”

See you at the mall.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.