.
Feedback

How Chelsea’s Future Killer Tried to Check Himself In—and Was Refused

Last in a series: Caitlin Rother’s “Lost Girls” detailed many efforts by John Gardner to seek help.

Updated at 10:50 a.m. March 1, 2013

In the weeks before he raped and killed Poway High School senior Chelsea King, John Gardner tried to get help before he hurt someone else.

But mental health and substance abuse facilities in two counties kept turning him away—at least a half-dozen times.

That’s one of the key revelations of Lost Girls by Caitlin Rother, whose book documents the many cracks the violent sexual offender fell through before being sent to prison for life in the murders of Chelsea and, a year earlier, Amber Dubois.

Gardner’s mother, who described him as “Charlie Sheen on steroids,” took him to a public psychiatric facility in Riverside County on Feb. 8, 2010.

“I thought I was going to get committed,” Gardner told Rother.

He said he told a psychiatrist there: “I’m afraid I’m either going to kill somebody or kill myself. … I think I’m a 5150”—a reference to a state law that allows authorities to hold someone for 72 hours as a danger to himself or others.

Gardner quoted the doctor as telling him: “I just think you need medication. … If the problem continues, come back and see me.”

Even when Gardner suggested that he be locked up for a few days—while adjusting to medications—the doctor said “he should be fine once he started the prescription,” Rother wrote.

Seventeen days later, Gardner attacked Chelsea in Rancho Bernardo Community Park.

Privacy laws kept Rother from officially confirming the mental hospital visit, but Gardner’s mother produced a pair of drug bottles dated Feb. 8, she wrote. 

Neither could anyone provide phone records of Gardner calling six to eight facilities for a place to check in. But Rother checked with the county of San Diego and learned that none of the 1,115 drug-treatment or mental-health inpatient beds in the region would accept sex offenders—even ones who know they are  feeling homicidal.

Outrage over the case led many voices, including Chelsea’s family and the Chelsea’s Light Foundation, to campaign for stricter laws governing sex offenders.

One result was Assembly Bill 1844, known as Chelsea’s Law, authored by former Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher and signed into law in September 2010.

But Rother’s investigation of Gardner and his psychiatric nurse mother’s efforts to get him help revealed other loopholes or inadequacies in state law.

While The San Diego Union-Tribune urged action on its front page, Rother quietly chose to let her work speak for itself.

“I’m not an activist,” she said last month. “People have said: Well, what should we do? That’s not my job. My job is to show you what’s wrong.

“It’s somebody else’s job to write the legislation.”

But in a late-January Patch interview at a bagel shop not far from her Kensington home, Rother outlined four “problem” areas that she thinks call out for the public’s attention:

The lack of substance-abuse and mental-health beds that take sex offenders

San Diego County likely isn’t alone in this respect, Rother said. “I guarantee you it’s like that in other counties.”

When they are homeless and jobless and can't get help, sexual offenders can “disintegrate,” she said, and then “we are in danger. I’m not saying that to be sympathetic to them, but if they don’t have a place to go when they know they need help—we are all in touble.”

Reform of 5150 regulations

Rother says it is her understanding of the law that if a violent sexual offender walks into a county mental health facility and says he’s a 5150, staff will ask him: “Do you feel like hurting someone right now?”

And if the offender says no, she said, “they have to let him go.”

In Gardner’s case, she told Patch, “it’s clear he needed help and they gave him the wrong medication. They [the pills] made him more manic.”

Better classification of offenders

Rother notes that Gardner was designated a low-risk offender “when he should have been designated, I believe, as a sexually violent predator—which are people who get sent to that $180,000-a-year facility in Coalinga.”

The high expense may sound ridiculous to taxpayers, “but it’s our system,” Rother said. “I’m sure that’s why they don’t designate people like him. We don’t have the money to treat people like that.”

But she thinks too little attention is given the system that deemed Gardner “low-risk.” 

“Where are the people who are looking at his records that I looked at—when he had that breakdown in prison [and was] threatening to kill people?”

“How did he get released?”

Rother’s theory is that officials thought: “Oh, he’s medicated, so he’s OK. At that moment … they screwed up.”

Perhaps corrections officials wanted to keep him in prison for the 2000 assault on a 13-year-old neighbor. But “mental health [officials] said he’s OK.”

That issue is addressed in Chelsea’s Law, but Rother says offender designations and their monitoring while on and off parole still need attention.

GPS monitoring of offenders on probation

Rother says people feel safe because parolees “are wearing that bracelet” on their ankle—“when in fact nobody’s watching them. Those bracelets are not for real-time monitoring. Everybody thinks they are, but they are not.”

Epilogue: Contrasting courses of action

In March 2010, the Union-Tribune began running a series of editorials under the heading “A Call to Action.”

“Over the course of coming weeks, probably months, this newspaper’s editorial board will step out of the ivory tower in ways it has never done before,” said one on March 14. “We will try to accomplish two things: to lead this community on a fact-finding mission about all the issues involved and, from those facts, build a recommended plan of action.”

The result was the law signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Rother dove far deeper into Gardner’s horrific childhood and issues growing out of his mental illness. But as an author and freelance writer—even one with decades of investigative reporting experience with “traditional media”—she had no outlet behind her pushing for reform.

In fact, Rother doesn’t even have a press credential.

The San Diego Police Department—which handles press-pass requests for all local law enforcement—turned Rother down.

Monday: The Firestorm That Fizzled: ‘Lost Girls’ Author Defused Mother of Victim

Tuesday: Of Mice and Monsters: How Caitlin Rother Grew Up to Be a True-Crime Author

Wednesday: Killer Interview: Author Found a ‘Totally Friendly, Charming’ John Gardner

Thursday: Caitlin Rother takes an interest in Coronado’s Rebecca Zahau case.

Friday: How Chelsea's Killer Tried to Turn Himself In—and Was Refused

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.