.
Feedback

Opinion: Social Security—Strong and More Important Than Ever

Charlie Williams explains why, as Social Security turns 77, it has become more important than ever.

By Charlie Williams

Social Security celebrated its 77th birthday on Aug. 14. This year as in past years we once again find Social Security healthy and going strong, much like most senior citizens today who wear their age so well, thanks in great part to the economic protection of Social Security in their retirement years. 

American workers have come to rely on Social Security more than ever, and for good reason. Study after study have shown that most workers are not financially ready for retirement. That is especially true when relying on their company to provide them with a pension, as company pensions are disappearing at an alarming rate. Efforts at saving enough for retirement have failed for far too many and they are left to rely on Social Security as their main source of retirement income. 

Teresa Ghilarducci reports in a July 21 article in The New York Times that “75 percent of Americans nearing retirement age in 2010 had less than $30,000 in their retirement accounts.” Not very much for seniors who are expected to live well into their 70s, many into their 80s, 90s and even 100s. An Aug. 7 article appearing in the U-T San Diego business section by Barbara Bry and Neil Senturia looks into overall investment returns over the last 10 years and reports that odds were long, and returns were small even for top investors, noting that, “To make it into the top 25 percent, you needed to return only 92 cents of every dollar invested with your firm.”

That is a big ouch for most investors, much less the average investor. Their findings illustrate the difficulty in making it in the investment world over these past 10 years. And it is quite clear $30,000 in savings will not ensure anything near a comfortable retirement. Faced with that fact, Social Security benefits become more important than ever and the need for workers and retirees alike to better educate themselves on how crucial Social Security has become to our economic well-being—not only in retirement, but throughout our lives.

As we celebrate this 77th year of Social Security, we discover benefits have grown quite a bit since 1987 while company retirement plans and investment prospects have failed to keep up with needed income for most people in their retirement years. Many company retirement plans have disappeared, though some were replaced with a 401(k)-type plan, which I will discuss later on in this article. While pension benefits have shrunk or disappeared over this time span, Social Security benefits have actually grown, giving a foundation of income for retirees they would otherwise not have.

Using the Social Security Average Indexed Monthly Earnings (AIME), monthly benefits payable in 1987 for a person with an average monthly income of  $2,009 at age 65 received a monthly benefit of only $789. But by the year 2012 at that same amount of average earnings, retirees receive $1,618 in monthly Social Security benefits. (Source: Automatic Determinations Workers with Maximum-Taxable Earnings). The average Social Security benefit at the beginning of the year 2012 was $1,230.

Simple math tells us those paying into Social Security do much better in their retirement income than those relying on investments in the stock market. It is equally obvious that a retiree with the average savings of only $30,000 will quickly run out of their retirement savings. On the other hand, their Social Security benefits are guaranteed for the life of the retiree.

Social Security was never intended to be a person’s total income in their retirement years. Instead that was the promise of the 401(k) made in 1978 (Revenue Act of 1978) when Congress amended the Internal Revenue Code, later called section 401(k). But the promise Congress gave us at the time has never materialized. One reason is due in part to low investment returns and heavy stock market losses since 401(k)’s inception.

The latest and most heavy losses occurred in 2007-8 when the economy tanked. Far too many retirees banked on their 401(k) and other investments as their major source of retirement income, only to lose their retirement nest egg in the stock market and more often than not lose their homes to bank foreclosure, foreclosed on by the very banks who caused the economic collapse.

Not too long ago we were taught about using the three-legged stool for retirement planning:

• Social Security

• Pension

• Savings

Unfortunately, two of the legs of the stool have been broken or severely damaged, leaving only Social Security intact.

While two legs of the retirement stool have been damaged, monthly payments of Social Security benefits have never stopped or even slowed down. Nor have Social Security benefits ever been reduced, even though the economy tanked and we found ourselves in the worst recession since the Depression era, which helped in getting Congress to pass the Social Security Act in 1935

One might think the Social Security Trust Fund would have tanked in the current economic downturn along with millions of workers’ jobs who were paying into the trust fund. Fact is monthly benefits payments under Social Security have actually increased during this economic downturn. Yes, thanks to the Cost of Living Allowance, monthly benefits have increased as recently as this year.

Looking at how well Social Security has done over these past 77 years, a good case can be made to put more money into the trust fund so we would be better able to convince Congress to increase monthly benefits payments for future retirees and relax eligibility rules. 

As we celebrate Social Security’s birthday, let's also remember how well Social Security serves many millions of recipients, not only retirees but widowed children and the disabled, all of whom rely on Social Security benefits as a crucial part of their total income. The Social Security Trustees have most recently assured us the program is solvent with $2.7 trillion in surplus reserves, enough to pay full benefits to all current and future retirees for the next two decades.

So, let's celebrate the one retirement program we have come to trust over these past 77 years. Our trust in the program is reassured by the fund trustees who tell us the trust fund will remain strong and serve Americans for many years to come. Happy birthday indeed.

Charlie Williams is Chairman of the Field Mobilization Committee for the Alliance for Retired Americans and former Midwest States Political Director for the Machinists Union.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.