.
Feedback

Teaching Girls Early to Own Their Bodies

As parents, we try to teach our kids, early on, to own their bodies and protect them. We teach our kids to own our bodies just as feminists encourage all females to own our own sexuality.

In a recent opinion piece for CNN.com, celebrated author Naomi Wolf tackles some of the issues on the front lines of the struggle for control over women’s bodies. In “Kate’s breasts, Pussy Riot, virginity tests and our attitude on women’s bodies,” Wolf reflects on recent events such as an American University professor who breast-fed a baby in classtopless photos of Kate Middleton; a punk band that was sentenced to two years in a Russian prison after a staged performance in which they did high kicks that showed too much of their bodies; and Michigan representative Lisa Brown, who stirred controversy by using the words “my vagina” in the Michigan statehouse.

“In a hypersexualized culture, in which porn is available 24-7,” Wolf writes, “it is not female nudity—or discussion about vaginas or breasts or ‘pussy riots’—that is scandalous…Rather, what is still scandalous to our culture is when women take ownership of their own bodies.” 

Wolf makes a stellar point. As parents, we try to teach our kids, early on, to own their bodies and protect them. I tell my girls that their private parts are just for them. They’re theirs to touch and take care of unless Mom or Dad needs to help them and no one else, like the doctor, can touch them there unless Mom or Dad is present.

We teach our kids to own our bodies just as feminists encourage all females to own our own sexuality. Like Jaclyn Friedman, co-editor of the 2008 hit anthology “Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape,” who’s new book, “What You Really Really Want,” is a guide on defining, understanding and owning your sexuality. In it, she says, “I’ve learned that it’s possible for me to violate my own boundaries, and how damaging that can be, and how to resist doing that. I’ve learned…that ultimately, I get to make my own decisions about what’s good and bad for me.”

If owning our own bodies, private and public parts alike, means showing what we want of our bodies, when we want, then discussions about pornography and sexual practices are not what many portray. Wolf gets me thinking, as a mom, when she says, “Staging a strip performance is not disruptive to social order in Moscow, but three punk poets using their sexuality to make a satirical comment about Russian leader Vladimir Putin is destabilizing and must be punished.”

I yearn to someday help my girls see that they do indeed own their own bodies, and deciding how and when they use or display them is a powerful thing. It’s a powerful thing for them to be in control, full control of these decisions. When I say full control, I mean not even letting concerns about outside opinions or judgments hold sway over their choices. True autonomy means not caring if someone calls you a slut. 

“The issue is not the vagina,” Wolf writes, “but who gets to say what becomes of it and who owns it…In the struggle over sex, these choices are where the struggle lies: Who decides reproductive rights; who decides when and how breasts might be exposed; who decides who can say vagina and where; who decides who is a slut; and who must be punished with hard labor for asserting their right to define their own sexual and artistic identities.” 

So, while my discussions of what to keep private vs. public are kept very simple right now for my two kids, aged 6 and almost 3, I look ahead to a time when they can understand more nuanced subtleties. When that time comes, I want them to understand they have always been and will always be the sole owners of their bodies—their whole bodies in full.

In this way I hope to help them hold onto the power that they are only now understanding they have about what and when to show of themselves. I hope that concerns over what other people think or desire won’t override what they know they want for themselves. And I want to make sure that they remember that this ownership extends not just to what they show, but also to how they use and allow their bodies to be touched. 

If Naomi Wolf is right, and I suspect she is, and “these choices are where the struggle lies,” I want my girls innoculated. Perhaps by the time they begin to claim their own sexuality, or breastfeed their own babies, the battle for control over another person’s body will be a thing of the past. But if not, maybe they can become models to those who are still finding their power, yearning to claim what was theirs from birth, even if no one wanted them to know it. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.