.
Feedback

Gay Fil A for the Christian Palate...

Gay marriage is not about sanctity—it’s about civil rights.

Try this out… Take every thing you believe about Gay Marriage and everything you’ve read and insert the word “Black” wherever you see the word “Gay.”

Are we still so far behind as a culture and as a society that we will make the same mistake again?  We did it shamefully with People of Color.  We did it shamefully with Women.  We do it again now with Gay Americans.  To what purpose?  Why?  

Are we so afraid that allowing Gay Marriage will cause our own children to become Gay?  As if it’s a four letter word and by definition implies something less?  Are we really saying, “If my daughter’s Gay then it’s because those people over there influenced her.”  Wouldn’t that belittle God’s influence on a believer?

Or is it that we are really that righteous about Marriage?  Marriage ends in divorce.  It’s true.  There’s nothing to argue about that point.  Christian marriages end in divorce as often as non-christian marriages.  How’s that for righteous?  Where’s the sanctity that seems to drive so many Christians to argue against Gay Marriage?

Gay Marriage is a hot topic right now.  Recently Chick Fil A came under fire due to their Christian business stance.  I’m sorry, but I don’t see their practice as Christian.  But it’s not simply a Chick Fil A problem, because treating people as second class and denying them rights afforded to all other citizens should be everyone’s problem.

A few years ago when Prop 8 was a hot topic in California, I was playing golf with a buddy of mine and we somehow got on the topic of “What Would Jesus Do?”  His answer was simple.  ”Jesus would love them.”  I agree.  Jesus loves everybody.  And thank God he does because for some reason we all have difficulty doing that ourselves, which is of course the point of Jesus.  He loves us all, all the time, no matter what.  This is a belief I hold.  If that belief is to hold true, then how can I in good conscience treat a group of people as second class citizens and vote to deny them rights granted to all other people.  People who often as not do not hold fast to the Bible or a belief in God.  Yet My Christian friends will argue that the Bible says marriage is for a Man and a Woman.  And it’s true, the Bible does say that.  It also says, “ Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.”  In essence, Love is God.  Love is Jesus.  So how then can we be so quick to judge and do so under the pretense of sanctity?  

Should we look to the Bible for an answer?  Hmmm… how about The Pharisees.  They were legalists who were often full of pretense and more concerned about keeping tradition than in following God’s law.  Well God’s greatest law is to Love God and Love your neighbor. Matthew 22:36-40.  If we are to Love everyone, that means those who don’t share our beliefs or our view of the world as much as it does those who think just like we do.  We can pretend to follow the law but if we are not following God’s number one commandment by doing so, we will end up condemning ourselves, getting caught up in the minutia of the law.  And at the end of the day, for the United States, that’s what we’re talking about.  A single law.  The right to be married.

I voted for Prop 8 the first time around.  As a Christian I truly believed that the sanctity of marriage was for a man and a woman, and not for members of the same sex.  What’s more, I did not equate that belief as contrarian to my belief that God calls us to Love Him and our Neighbor.  ”I have nothing against Gays,” I would say.  ”I even know and like a lot of them.  I just believe that Marriage is not intended for them.”  I made a mistake in thinking that way.  I made a mistake when I voted.  But, thank God for our constitution and the way it is set up so that mistakes can be corrected.

It’s not about the sanctity of marriage.  It truly isn’t.  To my Christian friends, I say to you with great conviction that your marriage is as sacred as you make it yourselves, together, with God.  Acknowledging a Gay couples right to marry does not change that.

I have no doubt that by posting this I will offend some of you… the truth is, I hope I do.  If you’re offended then maybe, just maybe, you will consider like I did what you truly believe and why your beliefs are threatened by Gay Marriage or anything else for that matter.  God Bless.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.