.
Feedback

How to Get Your Teen to Pick the College You Want—Sort Of

This week's Evil Mother Lady confession: College applications are for the birds.

So, now it is time for the next confession—college applications are for the birds. Having spent much of the recent break and all of the Thanksgiving break working with my oldest on college applications, I wonder how anyone gets through the process reasonably healthy and sane. By the end, I was threatening to make a mockumentary about the process, especially the UC’s. Unfortunately, since my daughter is applying to several UC’s, I am banned from filming until my youngest has entered the school of her choice. So I get to write about them instead.

Let’s start at the beginning: where your child wants to attend college. This seems like a simple one, right? There are multiple websites that will take what you want in a college, filter the 4,000-plus universities and colleges in the U.S., and deliver, free, a list that meets all of your exacting criteria. The schools start snail mailing and emailing students as soon as those PSAT scores arrive. Websites abound, from the school, from school ranking systems, from the College Board, from student review sites, everything you want to know is right at your fingertips, just type away. Much easier than the voluminous bulletins my guidance counselor had, with generic information from which you gleaned what you could before you mailed in the magic postcard that signaled to the universities you were interested in having them inundate your mailbox. At least you would think it was easier.

Unfortunately, the ease of getting information meant my research-happy daughter was soon swimming in information overload. We gave her a summer assignment, pick your top 10 list of schools to apply to, she went away to summer pre-college programs (we knew that would knock two off the list right off the bat) and we gave timely reminders (read “nagged” to the 17-year-old brain). Picked her up from summer camp, asked for the list and received a blank, panicked stare. It was our first clue how complicated the college application system had become and yes, we were 20 years out of date without a clue that our knowledge was largely irrelevant.

She had attempted the research; the problem was there was too much information and little experience on her part in how to filter the information to start making choices. Not to mention the fact that at 17, you feel the world is wide open and choices are limiting, so why should you make them right now? It was time for a mom intervention (since dad was the person picking her up across country and having to deal with the consequences of inaction). I asked her questions about what she wanted in a school, put my research skills to work for 30 minutes and emailed her information and links on 20 schools that fit her criteria. And I admit, I tailored the list and weeded out some probably dandy schools that were too inconvenient to fly to easily or were located in cities that didn’t rank highly for safety in my eyes. If she had the summer to do the research and make choices and opted not to, I felt comfortable providing my very prejudiced list for her review. My research time, my choices. If you want different choices, do the research yourself.

That’s not to say the list I generated was the one we ended up with; no, once there was a list, she dove in and tore it apart. She had a field day, criticizing the schools I left off and adding them, pointing out my ignorance in which schools were truly urban rather than suburban, explaining why certain art schools weren’t ranked (did you realize if there are no graduate programs for a degree, it usually isn’t ranked in the guides?), and which art schools excelled at the majors she was interested in. That was when I realized she really had done the research, she just didn’t know how to get to a starting point, which is where mom needed to come in. From my personal experience, that was what we did with our guidance counselor—times have indeed changed. But more than that part of the college application process later.

Having survived much of the process, I can unequivocally state I am no fan of the college application process. However, since my children are my retirement policy and we will be paupers by the time we put them through college, I am a big fan of positioning them to earn enough money afterwards to provide me a tiny house and someone to cook for me and drive me around in my old age. With my $300,000-plus investment per child plus interest, I am banking on a million-dollar payoff. So, how about you?

Follow Poway Patch on Facebook and Twitter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Poway Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Status Quo March 30, 2013 at 08:26 pm
Ken' "since most of the pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and LittleRead More League) have been doing it for years." "The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet." Right up front, this is not attack of your insider view... however you make excellent case of the dubious nature of Mr. Maienschein's efforts. The organization you umpire, is already pro-active(if no perpetrators have been present within the org.) and legislation is an interference. Although the Assemblyman shares my Party affiliation as Republican, his legislation is a Progressive trojan-horse adding a layer of expansive over-governance. Ken, will his legislation improve the efficacy of background checks? Will it force lesser pro-active or ill-financed organizations to fold? Although I align myself with Scott Nelson's bottom line and sentiments, quite reticent to believe "local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for" anything themselves. For it is you and me, not legislators or governance that pays for programs such as these. I have found Government, highly inefficient and bad stewards of the interests of our children. In the interest of efficiency, I am quite confident in order to coach his daughter's soccer team he has passed his background check... and quite willing under my added mandate, to allow his check to suffice for legislative service as compliant.
Ken Mosley March 30, 2013 at 04:03 pm
Being an umpire of youth sports for nearly 40 years, I am all in favor of this, since most of theRead More pro-active sports organizations (ASA (softball), AYSO, and Little League) have been doing it for years. I am charged a fee by the organizations that I choose to officiate to cover the costs of this background check. I support knowing that the service that help to provide will not be tainted by those who have already been found to mis-behave with children. The only thing is that it won't stop those that have not been caught yet. It is a sad state of affairs that we have to do this, but it's because it's for our kids that we must.
Scott Nelson March 30, 2013 at 10:42 am
Having run a youth basketball league with close to 1,000 kids for 3 years, I can tell you that whileRead More the idea has some merit, the costs and time associated with it are enormous. If the local governments/state governments are willing to provide and pay for the mechanism to do this- great. If not, should be the responsibility of the parents to not just drop their kids and leave them for hours at a time, but actually perhaps stay for practices or heaven forbid actually help and participate to insure that everything is fine in THEIR children's environment.....A little personal responsibility for their own kids would be a new concept to a lot of parents...
Kathy April 19, 2013 at 02:40 pm
Well Colleen O'Connor, I have a daughter in the California system, and am appalled at yourRead More statements...Are you that blind. Did you write that and smile, patting yourself on the back at how 'stand up' and 'righteous' you are. Yes, instead of just going to visit, why don't you try spending a week, a month, more in the system...you think walking thru will give you an idea about how the treatment is. You won't even see the truth, even going for a surprise visit. I too do not condone the crimes, but you in your judgemental mindset have no idea. Yes, they made bad choices, but it does not make them all bad people, I agree the promotions to DA's should be more on the rehabilitation rate, rather than the number they interject into the system. Sad, your article is so sad. Think of the families of the incarcerated and how your comments can affect them as well as tjhe incarcerated, who already have their own guilt to bear, their own hurt, you have no idea how hard it is to be away from family, every movement controlled, missing births, deaths, children growing up. You don't think so many of them are sick at the situation they got themselves into? Do you not even have compassion as a person. You never expect it to happen to your loved one, my daughter was a working soccer mom, a devoted wife & mother, a loving person with a huge heart. Not everyone is evil or bad, they just made a bad choice. I agree, is the Gov. above the law cause he has a title??? Think about it.
aprillacy32@yahoo.com April 19, 2013 at 02:23 pm
Mike you are spot on this is what I have been saying and trying to get them listen CDCR, my teacherRead More and I were just discussing how lifers are the only inmates offered rehabilitation which makes no sense at all to me when a man serving 5 or 10 who will be getting out does not receive rehabilitation this is a cycle that is repeating it's self and there are so many family's kid's who need there parent's this has a far greater impact on our community in so many way's and different level's that we have to find a solution
mike April 19, 2013 at 03:02 am
The prison industry complex is one of the fastest-growing industries in the United States and itsRead More investors are on Wall Street. “This multi-million-dollar industry has its own trade exhibitions, conventions, websites, and mail-order/Internet catalogs. It also has direct advertising campaigns, architecture companies, construction companies, investment houses on Wall Street, plumbing supply companies, food supply companies, armed security, and padded cells in a large variety of colors.”. This country is in a state of lock em up and forget, until it hits your family or friends. I'm am in no way condoning the crime some ding dongs commit, but sentencing in California is out of control. Its called "union". Its called Big Green (Calif Dept of Corrections). Many can become productive members of society, many cant. We need a way to sort them out. District Attorneys build their brownie points and promotions on convictions, maybe promotions should be built on rehabilitation and success rather than penalty, Things that make you go Hmmmm!
Frank H. Robles April 11, 2013 at 12:07 pm
She will run.... but not get the Nomination....!!!
Gail April 10, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Yup! I agree with it all.
Dan Wright April 4, 2013 at 10:50 am
It has only been a few weeks, but to me, it looks like Congressman Peters is doing a great jobRead More representing the diverse interests of his district. I am delighted that as a Democrat, he is reaching out to the Republicans in his district. If there were a hundred more like Scott, we would not have such partisan gridlock crippling our country.